Case study
Concept study: leadership dashboards with machine-drafted commentary anchored to live metrics. The exploration that shaped the anti-dashboard stance.

Problem
Leadership teams lack a single source of truth with proactive commentary across product lines.
Approach
Explored a modular narrative framework with scenario planning and AI-generated commentary anchored to live metrics.
Result
A design exploration, not a client engagement. It shaped the anti-dashboard stance: AI commentary belongs inside the workflow, not on another screen.
Leadership teams lack a single source of truth with proactive commentary across product lines.
Explored a modular narrative framework with scenario planning and AI-generated commentary anchored to live metrics.
A design exploration, not a client engagement. It shaped the anti-dashboard stance: AI commentary belongs inside the workflow, not on another screen.
Northstar Analytics is a concept study: a design exploration, not a shipped client dashboard. It tested whether AI-generated commentary could make leadership reporting read like a briefing instead of a wall of charts.
Leadership teams rarely lack data; they lack a shared narrative. Metrics live in one tool, context in another, and the "so what" arrives late, if at all.
This study sharpened a conviction that now runs through the real work: most teams don't need another dashboard; they need the commentary delivered inside the tools they already check. That anti-dashboard stance is documented in the writing and applied in the shipped workflow systems.
A design exploration, not a client engagement. It shaped the anti-dashboard stance: AI commentary belongs inside the workflow, not on another screen.
If this is close to your context, the next move is usually a walkthrough or a short brief.
Next step
A walkthrough or short contact note is usually enough to test whether the fit is real.